Editorial 3/30/03 If the U.S. continues to fight a "Nice War" in Iraq expect a 3
to 5 year conflict and ultimate retreat
The editorial below written on 3/30/03 applies even more today.
7/28/06 The war will not be won fighting a "Nice War" and
complying with Geneva Conventions. The enemy attacks and deliberately targets civilians.
When there is collateral damage to civilians in retaliation...the international world, UN
and Liberals scream 'FOUL". The enemy will eventually win if the battles continue to
be fought peace meal. Hezbollah, Hamas and other Islamic Fascist Terrorists purposely
store their missiles and ignorant followers in and around Mosques, Hospitals, Peaceful
neighborhoods and United Nations stations. They'll wear UN, Israeli and American and
European uniforms for stealth attacks. They abide by no rules, while the international
community demands 'No overreaction to their attacks" Israel must take a twelve
mile border in Lebanon and international forces and Lebanon must hold it.
Consider this scenario in the United States. 8 Islamic Radicals take over a Childrens
Hospital in New York. They are strapped with explosives and threaten to kill children one
by one if their demands for release of prisoners in Israel are not met. What would the
response be? What would be your solution? What if they held hostages at
50 hospitals? Only 400 terrorists would be needed to put the US in total turmoil. The
solution is what the President is already doing. Attacking them in Iraq. The only problem
is the President has been fighting a 'Nice War". Troops who put panties on terrorists
heads are imprisoned themselves and serving time. While US civilians are beheaded. He and
his commanders have tied the hands of the warriors. Leaflets should be dropped from planes
warning civilians in terrorists held towns to get out within 48 hours. Troops should
surround the town and review all who leave. Then full bombing should begin.
Editorial 3/30/03
If the U.S. continues to fight a "Nice War" in Iraq expect a 3 to 5 year
conflict and ultimate retreat
Al Queda, Syria, Iran and Turkey are
slowly entering the conflict. We must rid our combat forces of journalists who are turning
this into a 24 hour video war game. If it takes a few journalists to get wounded, to have
them all extracted, then so be it! Millions may eventually die because of inadvertent
leaks. Sensitive Information on locations of troop formations and tactics have been
reported on a few ocassions from battle scenes. ("The tomahawk missle you see being
launched from my position should be arriving in Bagdad in about 6 minutes"- "The
unit I am with is going to return to the south" etc.)
They may have realized their errors only after the information was aired. "The round
the clock" US coverage is also being closely monitored by Iraqi intelligence and
screw ups by reporters should never have been a debatable issue.
Reporters were originally allowed in the war zones to confirm any weapons of mass
destruction that were discovered to prove the validity. Too late for that now. Tarik Aziz
has already stated to Peter Arnett in an exclusive interview that the US was going to
plant chemical and biological weapons and blame Iraq. Journalists MUST BE REMOVED... even
if on stretchers. Peter Arnett is given special treatment by the Iraqi butchers. Arnett is
a lacky boy escorted to prepared damage scenes to air footage blaming the US troops for
Iraqi civilian deaths. Arnett fails to ask the butchers why they call captured US troops
"War Criminals" and therefore are not bound by the Geneva Convention.
Questioning Iraqi's about Torturing our POWs or holding civilians hostage or mass
murdering defectors is not on Arnetts agenda.
Peter Arnett is a dangerous fool. He should be jailed under the Sedition Act> Click Here Sedition Act
3/31/03- NBC praised Arnett's
"outstanding" reporting from Iraq Peter Arnett - The Iraqi Mole
4/1/03- NBC fires Arnett. Arnett hired by Pinko Liberals to dig for dirt on US - Iraqi Mole digs in for a fight
We cannot fight a "Nice War" attempting to win the hearts of the Iraqi People
against such a ruthless enemy. Iraqi troops in civilian clothing, civilian hostages and
POW treatment defy Geneva Conventions. Why would any civilians in an Iraqi city remain
there? Because they might be hung of a pole upside down in the main street or
beheaded by Death Squads if they try to leave or support the Freedom coalition.
The majority of Iraqi troops are disguised as civilians. If Iraqi civilians don't leave,
revolt or hide they must blame Saddham for their demise. Expect a huge increase in
civilian/enemy casualties or a long drawn out coalition defeat.
Iraq's "death squads,"
"conduct sadistic execution" in public, including beheadings.
These death squads report to the Hussein family directly. … They dress in civilian
clothes and operate from private homes, confiscated from innocent people, and try to blend
in with the civilian population. They conduct sadistic executions on sidewalks and public
squares, cutting the tongues out of those accused of disloyalty and beheading people with
swords. They put on American and British uniforms to try to fool regular Iraqi soldiers
into surrendering to them, and then execute them as an example for others who might
contemplate defection or capitulation."
Before you let anyone criticize our brave warriors and Commander In Chief...ask
them
How would you liberate the Iraqi people under these circumstances? Would you treat
civilians/troops/al queda differently now?
There is no easy solution. One suggestion is
the rid the troops of journalists within the areas of conflict and have the Pentagon do a
daily summary of activity. Al Jazeera is distorting the War with one sided propaganda
while the US media continues to report information that should be held in confidence. The
war for Iraqi liberation can be lost. We hope not!
To US Civilian Nick Berg Beheading
Video |
