[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Real Estate Bank Owned Distressed Properties,
Short Sales and more
New York Foreclosures
News Archives -
Secretive donations to Barack Hussein Obama's Presidential Campaign
Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi gave a public speech praising Obama, claiming
foreign nationals were donating to his campaign. A pair of Palestinian
brothers named Hosam and Monir Edwan contributed more than $31,300 to the
Obama campaign. The Edwan brothers listed their address as “GA,” as in
Georgia, although they entered “Gaza” or “Rafah Refugee camp” as their city
of residence on most of the online contribution forms. Donors from the Gaza
strip had contributed $33,000 to the Obama campaign through bulk purchases
of T-shirts they had shipped to Gaza. The rise of the Internet and use of
credit cards have made it easier for foreign nationals to donate to American
This article reveals extremely disturbing
evidence that foreign nationals from the Muslim world are trying to
influence our presidential election thru illegal contributions to Obama's campaign. We're not talking a few dollars here. As Timmerman
notes, the Federal Election Commission has compiled a list of questionable
foreign contributions totaling nearly $34,000,000! We urge you to read the
Secret, Foreign Money Floods Into Obama Campaign By: Kenneth R.
More than half of the whopping $426.9 million Barack Obama has raised so
come from small donors whose names the Obama campaign won't disclose.
And questions have arisen about millions more in foreign donations the Obama
campaign has received that apparently have not been vetted as legitimate.
The Obama campaign and the Democratic National Committee began September
with $95 million in cash, according to reports filed with the Federal
Election Commission (FEC).
But Obama easily could outpace McCain by $50 million to $100 million or more
in new donations before Election Day, thanks to a legion of small
contributors whose names and addresses have been kept secret.
Unlike the McCain campaign, which has made its complete donor database
available online, the Obama campaign has not identified small contributors
whose names and addresses have been kept secret accounting for nearly
half the amount he has raised, according to the Center for Responsive
Federal law does not require the campaigns to identify donors who give less
than $200 during the election cycle. However, it does require that campaigns
calculate running totals for each donor and report them once they go beyond
the $200 mark.
Surprisingly, the great majority of Obama donors never break the $200
“Contributions that come under $200 aggregated per person are not listed,”
said Bob Biersack, a spokesman for the FEC. “They don’t appear anywhere, so
there’s no way of knowing who they are.”
The FEC breakdown of the Obama campaign has identified a staggering
$222.7 million as coming from contributions of $200 or less. Only $39.6
million of that amount comes from donors the Obama campaign has identified.
It is the largest pool of unidentified money that has ever flooded into the
U.S. election system, before or after the McCain-Feingold campaign finance
reforms of 2002.
Massie Ritsch, a spokesman for CRP, a campaign-finance watchdog group acknowledges that there is skepticism about all the unreported money,
especially in the Obama campaign coffers.
“We and seven other watchdog groups asked both campaigns for more
information on small donors,” he said. “The Obama campaign never responded,”
whereas the McCain campaign “makes all its donor information, including the
small donors, available online.”
The rise of the Internet as a campaign funding tool raises new questions
about the adequacy of FEC requirements on disclosure. In pre-Internet
fundraising, almost all political donations, even small ones, were made by
bank check, leaving a paper trail and limiting the amount of fraud.
But credit cards used to make donations on the Internet have allowed for far
“While FEC practice is to do a post-election review of all presidential
campaigns, given their sluggish metabolism, results can take three or four
years,” said Ken Boehm, the chairman of the conservative National Legal and
Already, the FEC has noted unusual patterns in Obama campaign donations
among donors who have been disclosed because they have gone beyond the $200
FEC and Mr. Doodad Pro and Mr. Good Will
When FEC auditors have questions about contributions, they send letters to
the campaign’s finance committee requesting additional information, such as
the complete address or employment status of the donor.
Many of the FEC letters that Newsmax reviewed instructed the Obama campaign
to “redesignate” contributions in excess of the finance limits.
Under campaign finance laws, an individual can donate $2,300 to a candidate
for federal office in both the primary and general election, for a total of
$4,600. If a donor has topped the limit in the primary, the campaign can
“redesignate” the contribution to the general election on its books.
In a letter dated June 25, 2008, the FEC asked the Obama campaign to verify
a series of $25 donations from a contributor identified as “Will, Good” from
Mr. Good Will listed his employer as “Loving” and his profession as “You.”
A Newsmax analysis of the 1.4 million individual contributions in the latest
master file for the Obama campaign discovered 1,000 separate entries for Mr.
Good Will, most of them for $25.
In total, Mr. Good Will gave $17,375.
Following this and subsequent FEC requests, campaign records show that 330
contributions from Mr. Good Will were credited back to a credit card. But
the most recent report, filed on Sept. 20, showed a net cumulative balance
of $8,950 — still well over the $4,600 limit.
There can be no doubt that the Obama campaign noticed these contributions,
since Obama’s Sept. 20 report specified that Good Will’s cumulative
contributions since the beginning of the campaign were $9,375.
In an e-mailed response to a query from Newsmax, Obama campaign spokesman
Ben LaBolt pledged that the campaign would return the donations. But given
the slowness with which the campaign has responded to earlier FEC queries,
there’s no guarantee that the money will be returned before the Nov. 4
Similarly, a donor identified as “Pro, Doodad,” from “Nando, NY,” gave
$19,500 in 786 separate donations, most of them for $25. For most of these
donations, Mr. Doodad Pro listed his employer as “Loving” and his profession
as “You,” just as Good Will had done.
But in some of them, he didn’t even go this far, apparently picking letters
at random to fill in the blanks on the credit card donation form. In these
cases, he said he was employed by “VCX” and that his profession was “VCVC.”
Following FEC requests, the Obama campaign began refunding money to Doodad
Pro in February 2008. In all, about $8,425 was charged back to a credit
card. But that still left a net total of $11,165 as of Sept. 20, way over
the individual limit of $4,600.
Here again, LaBolt pledged that the contributions would be returned but gave
In February, after just 93 donations, Doodad Pro had already gone over the
$2,300 limit for the primary. He was over the $4,600 limit for the general
election one month later.
In response to FEC complaints, the Obama campaign began refunding money to
Doodad Pro even before he reached these limits. But his credit card was the
gift that kept on giving. His most recent un-refunded contributions were on
July 7, when he made 14 separate donations, apparently by credit card, of
Just as with Mr. Good Will, there can be no doubt that the Obama campaign
noticed the contributions, since its Sept. 20 report specified that Doodad’s
cumulative contributions since the beginning of the campaign were $10,965.
And then there are the overseas donations — at least, the ones that we know
The FEC has compiled a separate database of potentially questionable
overseas donations that contains more than 11,500 contributions totaling
$33.8 million. More than 520 listed their “state” as “IR,” often an
abbreviation for Iran. Another 63 listed it as “UK,” the United Kingdom.
More than 1,400 of the overseas entries clearly were U.S. diplomats or
military personnel, who gave an APO address overseas. Their total
contributions came to just $201,680.
But others came from places as far afield as Abu Dhabi, Addis Ababa,
Beijing, Fallujah, Florence, Italy, and a wide selection of towns and cities
Until recently, the Obama Web site allowed a contributor to select the
country where he resided from the entire membership of the United Nations,
including such friendly places as North Korea and the Islamic Republic of
Unlike McCain’s or Sen. Hillary Clinton’s online donation pages, the Obama
site did not ask for proof of citizenship until just recently. Clinton’s
presidential campaign required U.S. citizens living abroad to actually fax a
copy of their passport before a donation would be accepted.
With such lax vetting of foreign contributions, the Obama campaign may have
indirectly contributed to questionable fundraising by foreigners.
In July and August, the head of the Nigeria’s stock market held a series of
pro-Obama fundraisers in Lagos, Nigeria’s largest city. The events attracted
local Nigerian business owners.
At one event, a table for eight at one fundraising dinner went for $16,800.
Nigerian press reports claimed sponsors raked in an estimated $900,000.
The sponsors said the fundraisers were held to help Nigerians attend the
Democratic convention in Denver. But the Nigerian press expressed skepticism
of that claim, and the Nigerian public anti-fraud commission is now
investigating the matter.
Concerns about foreign fundraising have been raised by other anecdotal
accounts of illegal activities.
In June, Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi gave a public speech praising Obama,
claiming foreign nationals were donating to his campaign. “All the people in
the Arab and Islamic world and in Africa applauded this man,” the Libyan
leader said. “They welcomed him and prayed for him and for his success, and
they may have even been involved in legitimate contribution campaigns to
enable him to win the American presidency..."
Though Gadhafi asserted that fundraising from Arab and African nations were
“legitimate,” the fact is that U.S. federal law bans any foreigner from
donating to a U.S. election campaign.
The rise of the Internet and use of credit cards have made it easier for
foreign nationals to donate to American campaigns, especially if they claim
their donation is less than $200.
Campaign spokesman LaBolt cited several measures that the campaign has
adopted to “root out fraud,” including a requirement that anyone attending
an Obama fundraising event overseas present a valid U.S. passport, and a new
requirement that overseas contributors must provide a passport number when
One new measure that might not appear obvious at first could be frustrating
to foreigners wanting to buy campaign paraphernalia such as T-shirts or
bumper stickers through the online store.
In response to an investigation conducted by blogger Pamela Geller, who runs
the blog Atlas Shrugs, the Obama campaign has locked down the store.
Geller first revealed on July 31 that donors from the Gaza strip had
contributed $33,000 to the Obama campaign through bulk purchases of T-shirts
they had shipped to Gaza.
The online campaign store allows buyers to complete their purchases by
making an additional donation to the Obama campaign.
A pair of Palestinian brothers named Hosam and Monir Edwan contributed more
than $31,300 to the Obama campaign in October and November 2007, FEC records
Their largesse attracted the attention of the FEC almost immediately. In an
April 15, 2008, report that examined the Obama campaign’s year-end figures
for 2007, the FEC asked that some of these contributions be reassigned.
The Obama camp complied sluggishly, prompting a more detailed admonishment
form the FEC on July 30.
The Edwan brothers listed their address as “GA,” as in Georgia, although
they entered “Gaza” or “Rafah Refugee camp” as their city of residence on
most of the online contribution forms.
According to the Obama campaign, they wrongly identified themselves as U.S.
citizens, via a voluntary check-off box at the time the donations were made.
Many of the Edwan brothers’ contributions have been purged from the FEC
database, but they still can be found in archived versions available for CRP
and other watchdog groups.
The latest Obama campaign filing shows that $891.11 still has not been
refunded to the Edwan brothers, despite repeated FEC warnings and campaign
claims that all the money was refunded in December.
A Newsmax review of the Obama campaign finance filings found that the FEC
had asked for the redesignation or refund of 53,828 donations, totaling just
under $30 million.
But none involves the donors who never appear in the Obama campaign reports,
which the CRP estimates at nearly half the $426.8 million the Obama campaign
has raised to date.
Many of the small donors participated in online “matching” programs, which
allows them to hook up with other Obama supporters and eventually share
e-mail addresses and blogs.
The Obama Web site described the matching contribution program as similar to
a public radio fundraising drive.
“Our goal is to bring 50,000 new donors into our movement by Friday at
midnight,” campaign manager David Plouffe e-mailed supporters on Sept. 15.
“And if you make your first online donation today, your gift will go twice
as far. A previous donor has promised to match every dollar you donate.”
FEC spokesman Biersack said he was unfamiliar with the matching donation
drive. But he said that if donations from another donor were going to be
reassigned to a new donor, as the campaign suggested, “the two people must
agree” to do so.
This type of matching drive probably would be legal as long as the matching
donor had not exceeded the $2,300 per-election limit, he said.
Obama campaign spokesman LaBolt said, “We have more than 2.5 million donors
overall, hundreds of thousands of which have participated in this program.”
Until now, the names of those donors and where they live have remained
anonymous — and the federal watchdog agency in charge of ensuring that the
presidential campaigns play by the same rules has no tools to find out.
By: Kenneth R. Timmerman NewsMax.com
Drudge Report |
| World Net Daily | Judicial Watch
| News Max | Front Page Magazine
Media Research |
Accuracy In Media | CNS News | Town Hall |
CBN | Push
Back | Cato Institute
American Spectator |
Heritage Foundation | Roll Call | Friends of Liberty | National Review
Rush Limbaugh |
Hugh Hewitt | Bill O'Reilly |
| Laura Ingraham |
John Loftus | Pat
Buchanan | Michael
| Neal Boortz | Bill Gertz
Coulter | Cal Thomas |
Ann Coulter Chat Room
Video News Current Events,
Alternate Energy, Immigration, Politics
Conservative News Videos
Multi-ethnic, illegal immigration advocacy group operating to support
enforcement of the law Minutemen
Opposes efforts to use federal immigration policies to force mass U.S.
population growth and depress wages of vulnerable workers.
(Jerusalem Post) | Arab
News (Saudia Arabia Daily) | Islamic Mid East News Wire
White House Press
Abortion is Murder
Color is a Conservative? |
New York Post
New American |
Free Republic | Citizens United | New Conservative Revolution | Conservative Union
Sia News | Insight Magazine | Free World Now
Rewards For Justice | FBI Web Site
Rifle Assoc |
US Dept of Defense | US Navy | US Marines | US Air Force | US Army | USA Freedom Corps | POW/MIA
American Legion | Center For Disease Control
Health & Human Services
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Las Vegas Here
Casinos, Discount Hotels
Travel, Clothing, Gifts
Diets, discount vitamins health medical news