Obama / Bush / Clinton U.S. Financial Crisis Real Estate Banking
The True Origins of This Financial Crisis -
American Spectator
When Barack Obama signed the financial reform bill in 2010, Chris Dodd and
Barney Frank were right by his side, but not a word was said about Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac.
"Fan and Fred could end up costing taxpayers more than $5 trillion," says
Lee Troxler, author of "Killing Wealth, Freeing Wealth." "Fan and Fred are a
far larger problem than the chicanery we saw on Wall Street. And yet there
was hardly a single sentence devoted to them in the 2,000-plus page
financial reform bill."
"Democrats in Washington are unwilling to yank away the bedsheets on the
financial scandal that they caused," adds Floyd Brown, co-author of "Killing
Wealth, Freeing Wealth." "While many of the bankers have been paying back
the money we taxpayers gave them, Fan and Fred continue to bleed red just
the way the Democrats want it."
In their book, authors Troxler and Brown revealed just how the dirty the
Democrats and their "Killionaire" bedmates really are ...
During the 1990s boom times, Fannie and Freddie became darlings of Wall
Street for two reasons.
One, they posted steady earnings. Two, they came with implicit guarantees
that if anything ever went wrong, Washington would ride to the rescue. As an
investor, it's hard to top that one-two combo. If you invested in Fannie in
1995, you were up 400% by 2001. Your investment in Freddie was up 500% by
2004. But not everything was on the up and up.
In June 2003, auditors were doing a routine review of the finances of Fannie
and Freddie when they uncovered certain "accounting irregularities." A small
panic rippled across Washington and made its way into the Oval Office.
Wasting no time, President Bush put Fannie and Freddie under Treasury
Department oversight and ordered them to behave responsibly. Presumably that
meant stop with the inflated earnings, the overpaid executives, and the
risk-taking with other people's money. But if the president was serious in
his admonitions, none of his subordinates were. Months passed without any
corrective action being taken. Soon reports of irregularities were upgraded
to evidence of "extensive financial fraud."
Turns out that Fannie's chairman, Franklin Raines, had been cooking the
books to help himself to an estimated $90 million in bonuses during his
tenure. His accomplice in the scam? None other than Goldman Sachs, headed at
the time by Henry Paulson who would go on, years later, to run the Treasury
Department and engineer the 2008 bailout of all his Wall Street friends. But
we're getting ahead of the story.
Despite clear proof of scandal so monstrous and damaging to the nation it
made Watergate look like child's play and Teapot Dome a college prank,
nothing happened. Trillions of dollars of home equity was in jeopardy
because of bad dealings at Fannie and Freddie, but the principles walked
with hardly a wrist slap. How could that have happened?
Was it because Fannie Mae Chairman Mr. Raines was an old pro at gaming the
system? Was it because he had been the budget director under President
Clinton? This isn't rocket science.
In any case, Mr. Raines had played a central role in the asset-stripping of
America. And he was unrepentant. He wasn't about to give it back. He started
calling in favors. He got plenty of help in his fight from a woman who had
been vice chairman at Fannie Mae, Jamie Gorelick. She had previously served
as deputy attorney general under Mr. Clinton, and was connected. An aside:
Ms. Gorelick was also the person most responsible for sabotaging U.S.
intelligence agency efforts to stop 9/11, as documented in the movie
FahrenHYPE 9/11
With Ms. Gorelick and Mr. Raines calling in chits across Washington, and
because the White House was taking a powder, the cover-up was soon complete.
To put a bow on it, the senior Democrat on the House Financial Services
Committee, Barney Frank, trotted out before the cameras and, guileless as a
schoolboy, announced: "These two entities – Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac – are
not facing any kind of financial crisis. The more people exaggerate these
problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will
see in terms of affordable housing."
As Democrats lined up to hide their culpability in the biggest financial
disaster in American history, the housing crisis deepened. It was just as
the ?Killionaires' wished. All part of the plan. The more people bought
homes they couldn't afford, the more chaos bottled for later exploitation.
And a lot of homeowners were in over their heads
By the time the housing market collapsed, 56% of Fannie's and Freddie's home
loans had gone to folks with below-average incomes, 27% of their loans had
gone to folks who couldn't afford rent much less a mortgage, and 35% of
their loans had gone to folks in the "underserved areas" (read: wherever the
Democrats needed to buy more votes to win). The results?
Back when the housing bubble was but a gleam in the Killionaires' eyes,
circa 1994, only about 4 percent of all home mortgages were subprime, with
31 percent of those subprime loans being turned into securities. By 2006,
just over 20 percent of the mortgage market was subprime and 81 percent of
those loans had been turned into now toxic securities. Former Sen. Phil
Gramm noted: "If this crisis proves nothing else, it proves you cannot help
people by lending them more money than they can pay back."
While true, his comments were but official window dressing. What the crisis
proved, in our view, was that the Killionaires were prepared to go to
incredible lengths to undermine the economy and amass their criminal
fortunes.
All of this information has been made public by Brown & Troxler, and other
diligent researchers. But it hasn't changed a thing in official Washington.
"The Democratic leadership knows that their key constituencies are either
committed to the team – right or wrong," says Lee Troxler, "or they're dumb
as cement. So the Democrats are free to continue flogging the official
version of the financial crisis as greedy bankers taking stupid risks,
instead of the truth that those bankers were only doing what Washington let
them do and the biggest problem of all was entirely of Washington's own
making."
For their part, Chris Dodd and Barney Frank now say they'll get around to
changing the bedsheets ... after the election. Why then?
Because to deal with the Fan and Fred problem would require forcing millions
of people who can't afford their homes out onto the street. "Not going to
happen while Democrats are running things," says Floyd Brown, "because most
of those freeloaders who got into houses they can't afford ... vote
Democrat."
Floyd Brown & Lee Troxler are among the few authors who correctly identified
the true causes of the financial collapse, but who also offer entrepreneur
investors a game plan for the rocky times ahead. Their book "Killing Wealth,
Freeing Wealth," is available from WND
http://superstore.wnd.com/store/item.asp?ITEM_ID=3674&ref1=email&ref2=080410KillingWealth
Send News,
Comments, Web Sites, Video Links to include
Submit
it Here
E-mail talk shows. Reference any
article and add> http://www.warriorsfortruth.com
Another way to
Email this site to talk shows & friends
Just
Click Here
Back to Conservative News Warriors Main Page
|
Foreclosed Real
Estate
Real Estate Bank Owned Distressed Properties,
Short Sales and more
Florida Foreclosures
Foreclosure Condos
Foreclosure Homes
New York Foreclosures
California Foreclosures
Nevada Foreclosures
Mortgage rates for U.S.
home loans
Loan Info
Gold Silver Stock Market
Your Adz
Online Here
Lasik Eye
Surgery Info
Diets, discount vitamins
Vitamins
Health Nutrition
Casinos, Discount Hotels
Las Vegas Here
Travel, Clothing, Gifts
Shopping Discounts
|