ndependent Conservative News Researchers and Editors Warriors explores Iraq War Terrorists Beheadings Illegal Aliens Immigration Mexico Border
Patrol Liberals Clinton Bin Laden Iran Books Islam Moderate Muslims  Bush Oil Saudia Arabia Religion Current News Stock Market Stocks Politics

Casinos Shows Attractions Maps
Gambling Tips

LAS VEGAS

las vegas shows casinos maps gambling tips discounts-shopping-online movies books computers travel hotels airfares Books Movies
Computers CDs
Travel Gifts
007 Online
News Blogs and other web sites feel free to Link to this Site - copy and paste this URL>  http://www.WarriorsForTruth.com
Back to Warriors For Truth Conservative News Main Page

RICHARD CLARKE REFUSES TO TESTIFY

National Security Adviser Condolezza Rice continued to maintain that her public testimony before the panel investigating the Sept. 11 attacks would represent a breach of separation between congress and the executive.

Now get this - Back in 1999: Richard Clarke refused to testify under oath, citing the same privilege as Rice. He has been bellowing like a bloated hog on the liberal tv shows about Condoleeza Rice refusing to testify.

On July 29, 1999, Richard Clarke was scheduled to appear before the Senate Special Committee on the Y2K computer scare.

Senator Bob Bennett (R-UT) chaired the hearing, and made the announcement that Richard Clarke would not be appearing before the committee -- due to a directive by the National Security Council.

The Clinton White House would not allow Richard Clarke to testify before Congress in 1999, for the same reason the Bush White House is using to deny Dr. Rice's testimony before the congressionally appointed 9/11 panel!

The congressional record; Senator Bennett - Before the committee comes to order, I have some information to share with you which I'm sure will cause some consternation and disappointment.

We were scheduled -- at the beginning of this gathering we agreed not to call that portion of it a hearing, to have a briefing from Mr. Richard Clarke. And many of you have been notified that he would be here and as recently as yesterday afternoon when I was with him, we were looking forward to his appearance and he was sharing with me some of the areas that he planned to discuss while he was here. Mr. Clarke, as many of you know, is the national coordinator for security and infrastructure protection and counterterrorism on the National Security Council.

Last night, into the evening, we were notified that the legal staff of the National Security Council had determined that it would be inappropriate for Mr. Clarke to appear. I have just spoken to him on the telephone. The rule apparently is that any member of the White House staff who has not been confirmed is not to be allowed to testify before the Congress. They can perform briefings, but they are not to give testimony. And that in response to that rule, Mr. Clarke will not be coming.

He apologized to me for their failure to tell us that in a way that would have prevented our putting out the press notice in advance. I do not, in any sense, attribute any improper motives to Mr. Clarke. We had understood that the briefing could be held as long as there was no record made of it so that it would not be part of the formal hearing. And we were prepared to receive his briefing with the court recorder being instructed not to make any record of it and that that would comply with the rule.

As I say, last evening I received a call at home after the Senate had adjourned telling me that that arrangement would not be acceptable to the legal staff at the National Security Council and that Mr. Clarke, therefore, would not be here.

He said in our phone conversation just a minute or two ago that he would be happy to come before the committee and give us whatever information we wanted in a closed briefing. I suppose we could have cleared the room here this morning and allowed him to give that briefing to the committee, but I felt given the fact that so many people had gathered it would be an inconvenience for them if we were to do that.

So we will schedule a briefing with Mr. Clarke at some future time. And the members of the committee will disclose that which we feel is appropriate to disclose based on his briefing.

We are disappointed. His conversation with me minutes ago make it clear that he is disappointed. I know he wanted to be here, but that is what has taken place in the last 10 to 12 hours.

So with that word of explanation and, as I say, disappointment to many of you, I will now officially call the committee to order.

The committee will come to order.

<Back to Warriors For Truth Main Page>


WARRIORS FOR TRUTH FOR CONSERVATIVE NEWS INDEPENDENT RESEARCH EXCLUSIVE ARTICLES

Oliver North ||  News Sources & Web Sites  || Warriors For Truth News Archives || FBI Web Site || NRA   || Smoking Gun
Accuracy In Media || Matt Drudge Latest News || Rush Limbaugh || Town Hall News || World Net Daily News || VDARE Exclusive
American Border Patrol || Israeli News -Jerusalem || Arab News -Saudia Arabia || Judicial Watch News || Islamic Republic News
Stock Market Predictions - Charts Predict Bear Market Interview with Bin Laden before 9/11 on Oil Jihad Al Quaeda
Cuba News - Human Rights Violations - Cuban Trade Embargo Beltway Snipers News, Archives Malvo and Muhammed
Slavery Today - News from American Anti Slavery Group President Bush Challenges the UN to Halt Slave Trading

CURRENT NEWS