What is a structured settlement ?
A structured settlement is a financial or insurance arrangement
One big advantage of a structured settlement is avoidance of taxes. When
properly set-up, a structured settlement can significantly reduce tax obligations as a result of the settlement, and may in some
cases may be tax-free.
Some people who enter into structured settlements may wish to purchase a new home or
car and do not have other financial resources.
There are companies that will offer to purchase your structured settlement
and pay you a lump sum buyout. They intend to profit from the transaction so
you may be offered a low ball price. It is best to contact a number
reputable and known companies that purchase settlements to get the best
deal.
Different States have enacted laws which restrict the sale of structured settlements,
and tax-free structured settlements are also subject to federal restrictions
on their sale to a third party. Also, some insurance companies will not
assign or transfer annuities to third parties, to discourage the sale of
structured settlements.
A structured settlement is a financial or insurance arrangement, including
periodic payments, that a claimant accepts to resolve a personal injury tort
claim or to compromise a statutory periodic payment obligation. Structured
settlements were first utilized as an alternative to lump sum settlements.
Structured settlements are now part of the statutory tort law of several
common law countries including Australia, Canada, England and the United
States. Although some uniformity exists, each of these countries has its own
definitions, rules and standards for structured settlements. Structured
settlements may include income tax and spendthrift requirements as well as
benefits. Structured settlement payments are sometimes called “periodic
payments.” Often the structured settlement will be created through the
purchase of one or more annuities, which guarantee the future payments. A
structured settlement incorporated into a trial judgment is called a
“periodic payment judgment."
A definition of “structured settlement” can be found in Internal Revenue
Code Section 5891(c)(1) (26 U.S.C. § 5891(c)(1), which states that a
structured settlement is an "arrangement" that meets the following
requirements:
A structured settlement must be established by:
A suit or agreement for periodic payment of damages excludable from gross
income under Internal Revenue Code Section 104(a)(2) (26 U.S.C. § 104(a)(2);
or
An agreement for the periodic payment of compensation under any workers’
compensation law excludable under Internal Revenue Code Section 104(a)(1)
(26 U.S.C. § 104(a)(1)); and
The periodic payments must be of the character described in subparagraphs
(A) and (B) of Internal Revenue Code Section 130(c)(2) (26 U.S.C. §
130(c)(2))) and must be payable by a person who:
Is a party to the suit or agreement or to a workers' compensation claim; or
By a person who has assumed the liability for such periodic payments under a
qualified assignment in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 130
(26 U.S.C. § 130).
It is important to note that the language immediately prior to Internal
Revenue Code Section 5891(c)(1) states that the definition that appears
there is "for the purposes of this section". Internal Revenue Code Section
5891 entitled "Structured Settlement Factoring Transactions" deals with the
excise tax imposed on the "factoring discount" (see IRC 5891(c)(4)), when
there is a purchase of structured settlement payment rights and the
exceptions to the excise tax. A number of structured settlement industry
commentators have been observed attempting to broaden the express language
that appears in the Internal Revenue Code.
Legal Structure
The typical structured settlement arises and is structured as follows: An
injured party (the claimant) settles a tort suit with the defendant (or its
insurance carrier) pursuant to a settlement agreement that provides that, in
exchange for the claimant's securing the dismissal of the lawsuit, the
defendant (or, more commonly, its insurer) agrees to make a series of
periodic payments over time. The defendant, or the property/casualty
insurance company, thus finds itself with a long-term payment obligation to
the claimant. To fund this obligation, the property/casualty insurer
generally takes one of two typical approaches: It either purchases an
annuity from a life insurance company (an arrangement called a "buy and
hold" case) or it assigns (or, more properly, delegates) its periodic
payment obligation to a third party ("assigned case") which in turn
purchases a "qualified funding asset" to finance the assigned periodic
payment obligation. Pursuant to IRC 130(d) a "qualified funding asset" may
be an annuity or an obligation of the United States government.
In an unassigned case, the defendant or property/casualty insurer retains
the periodic payment obligation and funds it by purchasing an annuity from a
life insurance company, thereby offsetting its obligation with a matching
asset. The payment stream purchased under the annuity matches exactly, in
timing and amounts, the periodic payments agreed to in the settlement
agreement. The defendant or property/casualty company owns the annuity and
names the claimant as the payee under the annuity, thereby directing the
annuity issuer to send payments directly to the claimant. If any of the
periodic payments are life-contingent (i.e., the obligation to make a
payment is contingent on someone continuing to be alive), then the claimant
(or whoever is determined to be the measuring life) is named as the
annuitant or measuring life under the annuity.
In an assigned case, the defendant or property/casualty company does not
wish to retain the long-term periodic payment obligation on its books.
Accordingly, the defendant or property/casualty insurer transfers the
obligation, through a legal device called a qualified assignment, to a third
party. The third party, called an assignment company, will require the
defendant or property/casualty company to pay it an amount sufficient to
enable it to buy an annuity that will fund its newly accepted periodic
payment obligation. If the claimant consents to the transfer of the periodic
payment obligation (either in the settlement agreement or, failing that, in
a special form of qualified assignment known as a qualified assignment and
release), the defendant and/or its property/casualty company has no further
liability to make the periodic payments. This method of substituting the
obligor is desirable for defendants or property/casualty companies that do
not want to retain the periodic payment obligation on their books. A
qualified assignment is also advantageous for the claimant as it will not
have to rely on the continued credit of the defendant or property/casualty
company as a general creditor. Typically, an assignment company is an
affiliate of the life insurance company from which the annuity is purchased.
An assignment is said to be "qualified" if it satisfies the criteria set
forth in Internal Revenue Code Section 130 [2]. Qualification of the
assignment is important to assignment companies because without it the
amount they receive to induce them to accept periodic payment obligations
would be considered income for federal income tax purposes. If an assignment
qualifies under Section 130, however, the amount received is excluded from
the income of the assignment company. This provision of the tax code was
enacted to encourage assigned cases; without it, assignment companies would
owe federal income taxes but would typically have no source from which to
make the payments.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structured_settlement
Send News,
Comments, Web Sites, Video Links to include
Submit
it Here
E-mail talk shows. Reference any
article and add> http://www.warriorsfortruth.com
Another way to
Email this site to talk shows & friends
Just
Click Here
Rush Limbaugh |
Sean Hannity |
Bill O'Reilly |
Bob Novak
| Laura Ingraham
|
Glenn Beck
|
John Loftus
Pat
Buchanan |
Michael
Savage |
Chuck Morse
| Neal Boortz | Bill Gertz
|
Ann
Coulter | Cal Thomas
Hugh Hewitt |
Rusty Humphries |
Ann Coulter Chat Room
Video News Current Events,
Alternate Energy, Immigration, Politics
Conservative News Videos
Multi-ethnic, illegal immigration advocacy group operating to support
enforcement of the law Minutemen
Opposes efforts to use federal immigration policies to force mass U.S.
population growth
Numbers USA
Drudge Report |
Politico
| Breitbart |
Judicial Watch
| News Max | Front Page |
American Spectator
Heritage Foundation |
Media Research |
Accuracy In Media | CNS
CBN | Push
Back | Cato Institute
Town Hall | National Review |
Roll Call | Friends of Liberty |
Israeli
Jerusalem Post |
Saudia Arabia Daily
New York Post
|
New American | Sia News |
Free Republic
|
World Net Daily
| News Google
Back to Conservative News Warriors Main Page
|
Foreclosed Real
Estate
Real Estate Bank Owned Distressed Properties,
Short Sales and more
Florida Foreclosures
Foreclosure Condos
Foreclosure Homes
New York Foreclosures
California Foreclosures
Nevada Foreclosures
Mortgage rates for U.S.
home loans
Loan Info
Gold Silver Stock Market
Your Adz
Online Here
Lasik Eye
Surgery Info
Diets, discount vitamins
Vitamins
Health Nutrition
Casinos, Discount Hotels
Las Vegas Here
Travel, Clothing, Gifts
Shopping Discounts
|