The Media Ownership Reform Act (Review Here)
seeks to restore integrity and diversity to America's media system by lowering the number
of media outlets that one company is permitted to own in a single market. The bill also
reinstates the Fairness Doctrine to protect fairness and accuracy in journalism.
Liberal Democrats are attempting to muzzle conservative talk radio: they are assaulting
free speech. Like the communists in the former Soviet Union, Americas liberals seek
to crush dissent by consolidating control over the mediaespecially talk radio, which
has emerged as the dominant medium for conservative opinion.
Allies close to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi are promoting legislation, which if passed,
will take off the air prominent conservative radio hosts such as Michael Savage, Rush
Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Bill OReillyalong with thousands of smaller
conservative broadcasters. The bill, entitled the "Media Ownership Reform Act,"
is sponsored by Rep. Maurice Hinchey, a leftist Democrat from New York. The legislation
aims to revive the so-called Fairness Doctrine of the 1940s: all
views are to be given equal time on radio. In particular, the Federal Communications
Commission would have the power to oversee and change radio and television content. The
goal is to tilt the ideological balance of power away from the right on the nations
air waves.
The real force behind the effort to censor conservative talk radio is the
progressivephilanthropist, George Soros. The radical leftist billionaire has made no
secret of his hatred for conservatives. He says President Bush has transformed America
into a militaristic, fascist empire. Moreover, Soros champions many of
liberalisms chic causes: abortion on demand, legalization of drugs, homosexual
marriage, euthanasia, unlimited Third World immigration, open borders, and one-world
government anchored in the United Nations. He advocates all the issues that are anathema
to popular radio talk-show hosts like Savage, Limbaugh and Hannity. Hence, he wants these
commentators to be exiled to the political wilderness.
At a recent National Conference for Media Reform, sponsored by Free Press, a
Massachusetts-based group heavily subsidized by Soros, Hinchey laid bare his plan to
silence conservative voices on television and radio. The anti-war McGovernite attacked
Savage, Limbaugh and other conservative radio hosts, saying they were
responsible for leading the U.S. into the Iraq war, as well as for preparing
the ground for future military invasions of Iran and Syria. According to Hinchey, these
men pose a threat to American national security. Hence, under his bill, they
would be fired.
"All of that stuff will end," Hinchey said.
In the Senate, the legislation is being supported by Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont. A
self-styled social democrat, Sanders is forming a media caucus with the
explicit goal of ending conservative hegemony on talk radio.
"Now is the time to begin asking that if networks provide their listeners with 99
percent of talk shows being with right-wing extremists, whether that really is what public
trust is about," Sanders said in an address in January. "Now is the time to open
the question of the Fairness Doctrine again."
However, this begs the question of why do radio networks have most of their shows hosted
by conservatives? The answer is a simple one: Theyre popular with listeners. Talk
radio is overwhelmingly right-leaning because it satisfies the publics growing
appetite for alternative news and commentary to the liberal media establishment. If the
Democrats dont like the opinions of Savage, Limbaugh or Hannity, then all they need
to do is go to CNN, MSNBC, NPR, The New York Times or The Washington Post. There are
countless outlets peddling the anti-war, anti-Bush mantras of the left.
The liberal media and political class have tried to marginalize conservative talk radio
for yearsfirst by ignoring it, then by demonizing it, and finally by attempting to
compete with it. Air America, with hosts such as Al Franken, was supposed to be the great
liberal alternative to conservative talk radio. But, in spite of all the puff stories in
The Times, The Post and CNN, Air America failed dismally to attract a large audience. When
Hinchey, Sanders, Soros and their liberal Democratic allies complain about the need to
give equal time to left-leaning views on radio, they forget one important
fact: The radio audience is not interested. Now, after the failure of Air America, the
Democrats are attempting to implement the final solution to their conservative problem:
censorship.
Eastern European conservatives have faced similar oppression for the last 15 years. From
Georgia to Croatia, Serbia to Slovakia, Soros media empire has relentlessly sought
to marginalize patriotic and conservative journalists. In many countries in the former
communist bloc, there are hardly any conservative voices left in the mainstream media. In
fact, the billionaire activist openly brags that the former Soviet empire has become
the Soros empire. He is now bent on destroying his ideological enemies in the
belly of the beastAmerica.
What Soros understandslike all ambitious leftists before him, such as Lenin,
Trotsky, FDRis that attaining cultural power is the necessary precondition to
achieving political power. The brilliant Italian Leninist revolutionary, Antonio Gramsci,
outlined this strategy in his theory of cultural hegemony. Gramsci argued that once the
left captures the commanding organs of culture and the media, the state will simply
fall into our hands. He understood that, by dominating culture and stifling all
voices of opposition, the left would be free to manipulate and mold public opinion,
thereby paving the way to permanent political dominance. This is why Soros and his
Democratic allies are determined to smash talk radio, the main bastion of cultural/media
resistance to the liberal regime.
The attempt to revive the Fairness Doctrine represents a direct assault on
freedom of speech. It is a concession by liberals that they are losing the battle in the
marketplace of ideas. Unable to compete with conservatives in the arena of rhetoric, facts
and reasoned argument, Democrats are resorting to the Stalinist method of stifling all
dissenting points of view. Unable to out-argue and out-debate Savage, Limbaugh and
Hannity, liberals are hoping to silence themonce and for all.
More importantly, the war on talk radio reveals the totalitarian impulse at the heart of
modern liberalism. Above all, liberalism is an ideology based on radical social
engineering. Its ultimate goal is to transform America into a society characterized by
economic collectivism, personaland especially, sexualliberation and
multilateral globalism. To accomplish these goals, the left must fundamentally restructure
the economy, the family unit, traditional bourgeois values, and even the nation itself.
This is why liberals ultimately rely on coercion to pass much of their agenda. They must
raise taxes and propose new entitlement programs (like universal health care) to keep
expanding the power of the state; they must push for homosexual marriage and abortion to
keep undermining the nuclear family; they must expunge religion and the Ten Commandments
from the public square to keep rolling back traditional morality; and they must insist on
amnesty for illegal immigrants and subordinating foreign policy to the United Nations to
keep subverting Americas national sovereignty and distinct cultural identity. Their
favorite tools of coercion are usually judicial activism and bureaucratic decrees. Now,
however, riding high after the November midterm elections, they are going for the
jugularthe outright silencing of their ideological opponents.
Conservatives must form a united front to prevent this blatant power grab by the Soros
Democrats. If not, the return of the Fairness Doctrine will not only be a
great victory for the forces of censorship, but a watershed moment in the continuing march
of liberalism against everything that is good, decent and virtuous in America.
- Jeffrey T. Kuhner is the editor of Insight www.insightmag.com |
|